The Adventure of the Three Boat Thieves: Justice on the Little Missouri

Stealing in the Badlands

On a cold day in March 1886, three men took Roosevelt's boat. It was a small affair, a makeshift vessel left tied along the Little Missouri River not far from the Elkhorn Ranch. The boat itself was hardly valuable—it was a crude craft, suitable for floating down the river in spring but not a significant financial loss. Yet the act of theft was a challenge to Roosevelt's authority and to the rule of law in the Badlands. The three men—Mike Finnigan (also spelled Finnegan), a half-breed known locally as “Dutch Charlie” (Chris Pfaffenbach), and a third man whose name varies in the accounts that have survived—were river drifters and small-time criminals, the kind of men who existed in the margins of frontier society.

They had presumed, apparently, that taking a boat from the Elkhorn operation would go unnoticed or unpunished. They had calculated without accounting for the man to whom the boat belonged. Roosevelt did not let small injustices pass because they were small. He did not permit theft because the item stolen had limited monetary value. Roosevelt understood that in a frontier where formal law enforcement was virtually absent, the enforcement of rules fell to individuals who were willing to assert their authority. If he permitted theft—even petty theft—he was signaling that his property and his claims could be violated with impunity. That, Roosevelt understood, was an invitation to more serious violations.

A rough cabin along the ice-lined Little Missouri, outlaw country of the Badlands

In March 1886, three thieves cut loose and stole Roosevelt's boat from the Elkhorn landing — a serious crime in a country where a boat could mean survival. (Theodore Roosevelt Collection, Harvard College Library)

Bill Sewall and Wilmot Dow aboard the flat-bottomed boat on the Little Missouri

Rather than let the theft stand, Roosevelt and his men built a boat and set off down the ice-choked Little Missouri, pursuing the thieves for three freezing days. (Theodore Roosevelt Collection, Harvard College Library)

The Pursuit: Three Days on the Frozen River

Roosevelt's response was immediate and characteristically determined. He would not pursue the thieves overland through the Badlands, a journey that would be difficult, dangerous, and ultimately uncertain. Instead, he would pursue them along the river itself. With his ranch hands Bill Sewall and Wilmot Dow, Roosevelt set to work building a makeshift boat to chase the thieves. The three men constructed a crude craft from available materials, and while they labored, Roosevelt took advantage of his time to write the first chapter of his forthcoming biography of Thomas Hart Benton. Then they loaded the makeshift vessel with two weeks of provisions and launched it into the Little Missouri, which was partially frozen and running with dangerously shifting ice.

What followed was a brutal three-day pursuit downriver through desolate country that tested the limits of human endurance. The three men—Roosevelt, Sewall, and Dow—with two weeks of provisions, were chasing three criminals who had a six-day head start and intimate knowledge of the river's treacherous hazards. The water was cold enough to kill a man within minutes. Ice jams created constantly shifting obstacles that could sink or overturn a boat without warning. The river repeatedly froze and thawed, often advancing them only a mile or two downstream each day. The blizzards swept across the district with brutality. The river twisted through the Badlands in ways that made navigation treacherous even for experienced rivermen. Yet Roosevelt, Sewall, and Dow persisted through it all, driven by Roosevelt's conviction that the rule of law mattered more than the immediate convenience of frontier justice.

On the third day, they caught up to the stolen boat. Roosevelt recognized the ringleader immediately as Red Headed Mike Finnegan, a notorious horse thief and scofflaw known throughout the region as a man who should have been hanged long before. Two of the thieves were off hunting when Roosevelt's party appeared. The third man, an old fellow who was essentially harmless, offered no resistance. When the other two thieves returned and realized they had been overtaken, they understood what capture meant. Finnegan himself hesitated for a second, his eyes "fairly wolfish," but as Roosevelt advanced toward him with rifle leveled, covering the center of his chest, Finnegan recognized he had no choice. One of the men immediately surrendered, throwing his rifle down beside his head in submission.

Once the thieves were apprehended, Roosevelt faced a decision that would have been unambiguous to most frontier men: hang them or let them go. Vigilante justice was not uncommon on the frontier. A man who had been wronged could take justice into his own hands, particularly in country where formal law enforcement was absent or distant. Roosevelt had the power. He had the justification. Frontier custom would have permitted it.

Roosevelt, however, possessed a conviction—unusual among frontier men—that the rule of law mattered, that justice required legal process even when the outcome might be the same. He would not hang these men, even though the opportunity existed and frontier custom would have permitted it. Instead, he decided to take them to proper authorities in Dickinson, approximately eighty miles away. He would march them across the Badlands to jail, where they could face trial and legal judgment.

The Guard: Reading by Firelight

The journey from the river to Dickinson was approximately eighty miles—a brutal trek across the Badlands in early March, when the spring thaw had turned the plains to sucking mud and the weather shifted unpredictably between bearable and deadly. Roosevelt made the decision to abandon the river route and march his prisoners overland instead, as progress downriver had become nearly impossible. The desperadoes, naturally inclined toward escape, understood that Dickinson meant trial and imprisonment rather than the quick bullet justice of the frontier. Every moment of the journey presented an opportunity for them to attempt escape or turn violent.

Roosevelt determined that he must guard the three prisoners alone. This meant staying awake for hours that stretched into exhaustion. To prevent escape attempts during the nights, he forced the prisoners to remove their boots and socks, making a barefoot sprint into the freezing Badlands less likely. The cold was so severe that Roosevelt dared not tie them up, fearing frostbite would claim fingers and toes before morning. Instead, he and his men mounted a 24-hour watch, never resting, always vigilant. For most of three days, Roosevelt walked behind the wagon carrying his Winchester, keeping his distance to avoid being overpowered. He rode with the others when possible, but never relaxed his grip on his rifle or his attention to the prisoners' movements.

During the ordeal, Roosevelt faced an unexpected challenge: he had brought a copy of Leo Tolstoy's Anna Karenina to read during the journey, and he finished the 900-page novel before reaching Dickinson. In a moment that captures both his desperation to stay awake and his intellectual appetite, Roosevelt asked the ringleader Mike Finnegan if he happened to have a book. Finnegan did—a dime novel about the exploits of Jesse James. Roosevelt borrowed it without hesitation and read that too, anything to keep his eyes open and his mind engaged through the ordeal.

The image is almost absurd in its incongruity—a rough frontier rancher, armed and exhausted, reading Russian literature and dime novels while guarding desperate men. Yet the image captures something essential about Theodore Roosevelt. He was a creature of contradictions. He was violent and sensitive, physically tough but intellectually voracious, capable of frontier relentlessness but committed to legal process and civilization's values. The nights spent reading Anna Karenina while standing guard over boat thieves, staying awake through sheer force of will and the help of a Jesse James novel, encapsulated the entire complexity of his nature.

On the second day out, exhaustion nearly overcame him. He had been awake for 48 straight hours, and the temptation to surrender to sleep was almost unbearable. His feet, bruised and raw from walking ankle-deep through gumbo and mud, burned with pain at every step. The food supply had nearly run out. He could barely stand. But he persisted, knowing that sleep meant death—either his own or the prisoners'. After nearly two more days of grueling travel, Roosevelt and his companions finally reached Dickinson. He delivered the three men to the sheriff, turned over his prisoners, and then, at the limit of his endurance, stopped the first man he saw on the street to ask for a doctor's location. He happened to meet Dr. Victor Hugo Stickney, Dickinson's only physician, who treated his badly damaged feet and became a lifelong friend.

Theodore Roosevelt in buckskin standing guard with his rifle

After the capture, Roosevelt guarded the prisoners around the clock, staving off sleep by reading Tolstoy's Anna Karenina by firelight. (Theodore Roosevelt Collection, Harvard College Library)

The rugged Little Missouri country the party crossed to reach Dickinson

Frontier custom would have hanged the thieves on the spot. Instead Roosevelt hauled them overland to Dickinson to stand trial — a point of principle he never regretted. (Theodore Roosevelt Collection, Harvard College Library)

A Moment of Frontier Ethics

The boat thief episode, though brief and ultimately minor in Roosevelt's biography, revealed something significant about his understanding of frontier ethics. Roosevelt lived the frontier life, participated in frontier hardship and physical danger, and understood the logic of frontier practicality. Yet he believed that civilization—the legal institutions, the processes of justice, the commitment to rule of law—represented something more valuable than the immediate efficiency of frontier justice.

This conviction put him at odds with many frontier men, who saw legal processes as irrelevant formalities in country where the federal government's reach was limited and justice depended on individuals willing to enforce rules directly. Yet Roosevelt understood, with a clarity that not all of his contemporaries shared, that the long-term viability of civilization depended on the willingness of individuals to defer to legal process even when they possessed the power to enforce justice directly.

Roosevelt's actions during the boat thief episode were known throughout the Badlands. They enhanced rather than diminished his reputation. The frontier men who knew him understood that he was not weak—his physical courage was beyond question, and his willingness to pursue three thieves down a frozen river demonstrated his commitment to protecting what was his. Yet they also understood that Roosevelt possessed a principle that went beyond frontier pragmatism: that the rule of law mattered, and that a man of principle would enforce it even when other men might have taken shortcuts.

A Moment That Defined His Character

The boat thief episode stands as one of the most revealing moments in Roosevelt's frontier years—a moment that captured the essential tension in his character between frontier action and civilized principle. He was willing to pursue criminals with relentless determination. He was willing to endure hardship, danger, and exhaustion to ensure that justice was served. Yet he was also willing to submit to legal process and formal authority, even when he possessed the power to enforce justice directly.

This combination of qualities—physical courage combined with commitment to rule of law, frontier hardness combined with civilized principle, willingness to act combined with respect for legal process—would define Roosevelt's public career in the decades that followed. Whether as a New York police commissioner, as assistant secretary of the navy, as a president, or as a conservationist, Roosevelt would consistently demonstrate this combination: the willingness to act decisively, to enforce standards, to pursue goals with relentless determination, combined with a belief that these actions should be conducted within legal and institutional frameworks.

The Badlands had taught him many lessons. The hunt had taught him that determination could overcome disadvantage. The ranch had taught him that honest work and principle were more valuable than wealth or privilege. The long winters had taught him that survival required resilience and focus. But the boat thief episode taught him something different: that the rule of law, and the institutions that enforced it, were worth defending even when breaking the law would be more convenient. That lesson would inform his entire public life.

After the winter of 1886-87 destroyed the cattle operations and Roosevelt departed Dakota for good, he carried with him the memories of four years that had fundamentally transformed him. The specific episodes—the buffalo hunt, the ranch work, the confrontation with the boat thieves—would fade into memory and eventually into historical record. But the lessons they taught, and the character they helped form, would endure for the remainder of his long and consequential life.

Continue Reading

Primary Sources at the TR Center

Explore original documents and resources related to this episode in the Theodore Roosevelt Center Digital Library.

From the Archives

Explore original photographs, documents, and illustrations related to this topic in the Theodore Roosevelt Center Digital Library.

Recommended Reading

  • Theodore Roosevelt in the Dakota Badlands: An Historical Guide by Clay Jenkinson (2006). ISBN: 0-9786267-0-2
  • Roosevelt in the Bad Lands by Hermann Hagedorn (1921)
  • The Rise of Theodore Roosevelt by Edmund Morris (1979). ISBN: 978-0-307-77782-9
  • Ranch Life and the Hunting-Trail by Theodore Roosevelt (1888)